location for link review

Dear Mr. Boyer,

I have a career offer for you. I first wrote on climate change in 1982 when I forecast worsening droughts with downwind deluges/flooding. One property of carbon dioxide accounts for climate/weather extremes and contradictions. The property is hydrophilia which is why we have carbonated beverages. Human sources of high CO2 generation soaks up water and prevents upper level precipitation. The CO2/H20 mass travels downwind until a "soda bottle shake" causes sudden explosive release as the CO2/H2O dissociation bandwidth is narrow compared to aerosol particulated precipitation. The title of your series of articles could be "CO2: Is it a global multi-tasking killer molecule?" with a subtitle for each aspect--see CO2 Killer Molecule.

I have done a lot of research, more than you can imagine since college half-a-century ago--see Timism.com. My work has been guided by an insight which I summarize as Timism: The Morality of More Time, aka, the periodic table of existence. I am not without intellectual, academic, and business achievements. I regularly have letters published in your paper, e.g., Feb. 6 on 529s being a Ponzi scheme.

I completed undergraduate requirements at So. Il. University cum laude in two years. One semester I aced 24 hours. My graduate studies were in physiology and neurosciences with an interest in the metabolics of carbon dioxide. I retired from positive cashflow at age 49, but, I have not stopped working to solve problems for others. I could go on but I would be repeating my resume and achievements.

Like most high intelligent beings, I am quirky and eccentric. Most people want to buy a smart pill while people like me priceshop lobotomies or bullets. For exercise, I don't walk a dog; instead, for instance, I walk a kite on the Potterfield Bridge.

Vote of interest and confidence: Since New Year's Day as 24in4--Share Job Time or Jobless Crime, I have issued 11 PR emails as a lead-up to my formal launch of Timists: The Party of More Time. Over the years, I have collected almost pertinent 6000 media and academic email addresses. (My email demcapu@*.* stretches back to the early 1980s: it stands for democratic capitalism which is what humanity needs to reverse climate change. My telecom/cellphone experience goes back to the late 1960s when I helped maintain the operation of one of first two cellphones--they were for POTUS to conduct war.)

Of the approximate 60,000 PR emails sent, I have had only 88 unsubscribes--about a 0.16% rejection rate. (RTD unsubscribes were 4 out of 36--11%/1%.) In other words, there is interest in my perspective or paradigm on climate change. I think your readers would appreciate the epiphanies except for your Trumpies and Pruetts. I am putting you on the PR email list; you can unsubscribe if you want.

I can meet with you to answer any questions or concerns. The revelations and integration of many seeming climate change contradictions within a single paradigm (CO2's hydrophilia) is worthy of a Pulitzer. I'd prefer to remain a non-public figure like most autistic aspergers.

I don't have your publisher's email address. If you think this has merit, please forward to him. If he emailed me an email address, I would put him on the PR email listing so he could keep ahead of certain opportunities: I am completing a multi-million dollar internet app the royalties of which will be divided between an academic and media hierarchy. For the single national royalty holder, I prefer across a trip across the river rather than state or nation. Using "brainbees," the software finds the Einstein moment for any public or private problem to best solve that problem, saving time and money. The range of applications has expanded since first tested on a touch-tone phone in 1989.

Will this be another example of putting the ball in the other court with no return?

CC: RTD staffers

e:/timism.com/Impotent/RichPubes/RichPubers.htm

Polar timebomb