Law Firm Sought to Litigate
the Veterans Administation
and V.A. Personnel

A law firm is sought to initiation lawsuits against the V.A. for denying me long-standing benefits and for a series of mistreatments violating federal, state and VA laws and regulations. Termination of employment will be sought against the persons who participated in the decisions to deny me treatment as well as the staff who were guilty of mistreating me.

Funding will come from the 10% of revenues allocated for veterans under the timism profit-sharing process--see example--as well as "SuperGOOHF's" for each employee of the lawfirm if the litigation is successful. One lifehour credit will be given for each fee dollar up to 10,000 if litigation is successful.

Benefits were denied at sometime prior to January 17, 2014. Who, when, where and why need to be determined by disclosure so as to punish the benefit deniers.

The plaintiff has suffered numerous mental and emotional pain as a result medication being withheld by the V.A., the Blue Clinic and Dr. Katherine Price. The extent and nature of this pain is listed throughout the letters and communication by the plaintiff to V.A. employees including certified letters to the Secretary of the V.A., Eric Shinseki. Preliminary litigation involved a request of the courts to order the VA thru the Richmond McGuire's Director, John Brandecker,

1. to provide a listing of what other V.A. benefits of the plaintiffs have been abrogated or withdrawn along with the revoked medication benefits,
2. to provide all legally required documentation of the plaintiff's health records as well as with whom this information has been shared either initiated by the V.A. with or without the plaintiff's consent or initiated by the request of a non-VA person,
3. to provide the date when the drug benefit was canceled as well as  the person or persons who made the decision, and,
4. to provide the rationale to medication benefit denial.

The crux of the matter is the following facts and questions:

1. Without notice, my medication benefit was canceled with the caveat that I need to reapply to be re-evaluated.
2. Either
   • A: the previous VA doctors over ten years (and private physicians for more than the prior twenty years) had misdiagnosed and mistreated me,
     or,
   • B: they were treating a condition which without medication becomes a debilitating hell-on-earth for the patient as he suffers sleep, alertness, and cognitiive disruptions--see logs.
     
3. If
   • the truth is that two VA doctors misdiagnosed and mistreated the plaintiff (previous option "A"), what does that say about those doctors? It means it is a waste of the plaintiff's time and VA resources for the plaintiff to be told in person what should be simply stated in a written communication, that is, "We at the V.A. do not think you were or are narcoleptic thus we will no medicate a non-existing condition," or,
   • the truth is that the prior two physicians were professional with the current V.A. administators and physicians being unprofessional for which redress and compensation are sought by the plaintiff.
     
     (Would the V.A. similarly cancel medication for an anti-blood clotting medication like warfarin? If the V.A. still considers me narcoleptic but has a hidden agenda for terminating my prescription medication rights, it shows one or more VA employees does not take mental disabilities as serious as they should: Should such people be in decision-making position in a world plagued with an increase in anger-driven, headline-grabbing human disasters?)
4. Because
   1. the plaintiff knows he is narcoleptic,
   2. because he is quite sure an independent panel would agree, and,
   3. because he is quite sure that VA personnel knows he is narcoleptic,
      
      the plaintiff
      1. not only wonders
         1. why the obstinance in logically providing an inexpensive medication ($9/month),
         2. why the escalating mistreatments culminating in denial of long-standing VA medical rights and
         3. why the "gulagizing" of the plaintiff in response to his mistreatment complaints,
      2. but is increasingly paranoid about medical treatment by the VA because its administrators are willing to waste thousands of dollars on litigation (if not eventually, lose million of dollars--Timism 10% gross receipts) instead of spending pennies for a pad to pen a prescription for the plaintiff.
         
         Something weird is happening at the VA to be this illogical. Some VA personnel needs to be summarily terminated.

The plaintiff seeks an extension of the VA's outsourcing policy of some procedures when overcrowded to include the plaintiff seeking private providers with the VA reimbursing the private providers. Would you go to a medical facility that not only mistreated you at least a dozen times but stonewalls your requests for reasons and for medication?

If you are interested in representing me, please email SueVA@Timism.com. Virginia law firms are preferred. If the email address is rejected, it means a law firm has been found.